Lived Experiences of Elementary Teachers on Literacy Development: A Qualitative Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v2i6.151

Keywords:

elementary education, literacy development, lived experiences, challenges, coping mechanisms

Abstract

This qualitative phenomenological research explored the lived experiences of elementary teachers regarding literacy development in four selected schools in Nabunturan East District. The 8 selected elementary teachers who provided literacy instruction were the participants in the study. It aimed to understand the experiences and challenges they encounter, the coping mechanisms they employ, and the insights they can share to improve literacy instruction. Using a phenomenological research design, data were gathered through in-depth interviews. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and significant themes. Findings revealed that teachers face various challenges in developing learners’ literacy skills, including diverse learning needs, limited instructional time and resources, low learner engagement, and insufficient parental support. Despite these difficulties, teachers demonstrated resilience by employing adaptive strategies such as differentiated instruction, varied teaching materials, and constant practice. Teaching that requires patience, creativity, flexibility, and a learner-centered approach. The study concludes that supporting teachers through adequate resources, professional development, and strengthened school-home partnerships is essential in improving literacy outcomes. The insights drawn from this research may serve as a basis for enhancing instructional practices and informing policies that support literacy development among elementary learners.

References

Allington, R. L. (2013). What really matters when working with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 66(7), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1154

Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cariaga, R., Dagunan, M. A., Cariaga, V., Sabidalas, M. A., El Halaissi, M., & Bacatan, J. (2025). Rethinking Parental Involvement in Developing Countries: Toward Inclusive and Culturally Responsive Education. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(5), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.39

Cariaga, R., Sabidalas, M. A., Dagunan, M. A., Refugio, C., Cariaga, V., Gerodias, E., & Cubero, G. (2025). Challenges of Pre-service Teachers in K–12 Classrooms: An Explanatory Case Study. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(6), 732–737. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i6.54

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Croninger, R. G., & Valli, L. (2009). Where is the action? Challenges to studying the teaching of reading in elementary classrooms. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09333206

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4

Goc-Ong, J. C., & Doronio , R. (2025). Mathematical Reading Comprehension in Problem-Solving Skills of Students: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(3), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i3.21

Goodall, J., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Educational Review, 66(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.781576

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Kelly, L. B., Wakefield, W., Caires-Hurley, J., Kganetso, L. W., Moses, L., & Baca, E. (2021). What is culturally informed literacy instruction? A review of research in P–5 contexts. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20984397

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Rice, M., Lambright, K., & Wijekumar, K. (2024). Professional development in reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of the effects on teachers and students. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(3), 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.546

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Saro, J., Pelesco, E., Abiao, J., Longaquit, J., Apique, J., & Palanog, J. G. (2025). Extent of Teachers’ Manifestation Toward Instructional Supervision and Assistance from School Leaders: Its Relationship to Students’ Academic Success. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 1(5), 604–630. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.38

Vaughn, M. (2015). Adaptive teaching: Reflective practice of two elementary teachers’ visions and adaptations during literacy instruction. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.944143

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Calasang , I. A., & Villocino , R. (2026). Lived Experiences of Elementary Teachers on Literacy Development: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints , 2(6), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v2i6.151

Issue

Section

Articles